Acid-base chemistry

3 Jun 2017
Evaluation Methods: 

Students were evaluated by the instructor during the activity. The instructor was available throughout the activity to answer questions and guide inquiry. This activity generated good discussion among students and most were able to work their way through. 

Evaluation Results: 

All students completed the activity during the class period and gained a deeper appreciation for metals in biology, protein structure, and using NMR to determine protein structure. Some students needed more guiding through the rationales of metal toxicities and the multi-dimensional NMR experiments than others. 

Description: 

This activity was designed as an in-class group activity, in which students begin by using basic principles to predict relative toxicities and roles of metals in biological systems. Students then learn about the structures of metallothioneins using information from the protein data bank (PDB) and 113Cd NMR data. By the end of the activity, students will have analyzed data to identify and determine bonding models and coordination sites for multiple cadmium centers in metallothioneins. It is based on recent literature, but does not require students to have read the papers before class.

Learning Goals: 

Students will be able to:

  1. Use fundamental principles to predict toxicities of metals
  2. Apply hard-soft acid-base (HSAB) theory to metals in biological systems
  3. Utilize the protein data bank (PDB) to investigate protein-metal interactions
  4. Explain the roles of metallothioneins in biological systems
  5. Evaluate 1-D and 2-D 113Cd NMR to determine structures of Cd bonding sites in metallothioneins
  6. Explain how NMR can be utilized to determine protein structure
Course Level: 
Corequisites: 
Implementation Notes: 

This activity was developed for a Master's level bioinorganic course, but could be utilized in an advanced undergraduate inorganic course. Students were given the worksheet at the beginning of class and worked together in groups to answer the questions. Students did not have access to the paper and had not read any articles previously. Using the PDB was done as a separate in-class activity, so students had some familiarity with the PDB codes and amino acid sequences. 

A brief refresher of [1H-1H] COSY was presented before beginning the activity. 

Time Required: 
60 min
3 Jun 2017
Evaluation Methods: 

This LO was craeted at the pre-MARM 2017 ViPER workshop and has not been used in the classroom.  The authors will update the evaluation methods after it is used.

Description: 

This module offers students in an introductory chemistry or foundational inorganic course exposure to recent literature work. Students will apply their knowledge of VSEPR, acid-base theory, and thermodynamics to understand the effects of addition of ligands on the stabilities of resulting SiO2-containing complexes. Students will reference results of DFT calculations and gain a basic understanding of how DFT can be used to calculate stabilities of molecules.

 
Prerequisites: 
Corequisites: 
Learning Goals: 

Students should be able to:

  1. Apply VSEPR to determine donor and acceptor orbitals of the ligands

  2. Identify lewis acids and lewis bases

  3. Elucidate energy relationships

  4. Explain how computational chemistry is beneficial to experimentalists

  5. Characterize bond strengths based on ligand donors

Course Level: 
Implementation Notes: 

Students should have access to the paper and have read the first and second paragraphs of the paper. Students should also refer to scheme 2 and table 2.

 

This module could be either used as a homework assignment or in-class activity. This was created during the IONiC VIPEr workshop 2017 and has not yet been implemented.

 
Time Required: 
50 min
21 Feb 2017
Evaluation Methods: 

Graded problems students turned in.

Informal evaluation during discussion.

Evaluation Results: 

Graded assignments: mean of 84, std dev of 12, so a fairly broad range of understandings

Informal: Students really enjoyed getting to evaluate published work critically and were quite engaged in discussions, which helped to bring some of the students who didn't understand the paper as well up to speed.  After the paper, students have felt much more comfortable questioning what is stated in papers, particularly if little or no support is given.

I will definitely use this again!  Unfortunate to find a paper with several important oversights in the literature, but it is a good learning opportunity.

Description: 

This LO is a problem-set-style literature discussion that leads students through a critical analysis of an interesting but flawed paper from the recent chemical literature.  Students use the questions to help them work through the paper prior to class, providing plenty of raw material for an in-class discussion about various aspects of the work from a mechanistic organometallic perspective.  The questions help students critically analyze substrate tables, spectroscopic data, and computational results from DFT.

Corequisites: 
Course Level: 
Learning Goals: 
  • Students will be able to pull out important mechanistic information from substrate tables in an organometallic paper
  • Students will be able to use knowledge of organometallic mechanisms and organic chemistry to rationalize findings in a catalysis paper
  • Students will be able to use knowledge of spectroscopy, particularly NMR, to understand structure and bonding arguments in an organometallic paper
  • Students will critically analyze a paper and learn to feel comfortable questioning assertions by authors, including the major findings of a paper
Implementation Notes: 

I had students prepare answers to these questions ahead of class and bring the answers with them.  To add incentive, I collected them as a homework assignment (though I graded some of the harder ones fairly leniently).  The questions helped prepare them for a class discussion of the paper, which I led with a few slides containing information from the paper and some other useful tidbits (I am happy to send those to you if you like, just contact me).

Time Required: 
1-2 hours student prep (reading paper); 45 minutes in class discussion
18 Jan 2017

calistry calculators

Submitted by Adam R. Johnson, Harvey Mudd College
Description: 

I just stumbled on this site while refreshing myself on the use of Slater's rules for calculating Zeff for electrons. There are a variety of calculators on there including some for visualizing lattice planes and diffraction, equilibrium, pH and pKa, equation balancing, Born-Landé, radioactive decay, wavelengths, electronegativities, Curie Law, solution preparation crystal field stabilization energy, and more.

I checked and it calculated Zeff correctly but I can't vouch for the accuracy of any of the other calculators. 

Prerequisites: 
Corequisites: 
Learning Goals: 

This is not a good teaching website but would be good for double checking math

 

Implementation Notes: 

I used this to double check my Slater's rules calculations (and found a mistake in my answer key!)

4 Jan 2017
Description: 

This is a great new textbook by George Luther III from the University of Delaware.  The textbook represents the results of a course he has taught for graduate students in chemical oceanography, geochemistry and related disciplines.  It is clear that the point of the book is to provide students with the core material from inorganic chemistry that they will  need to explain inorganic processes in the environment.  However the material is presented in such a clear, logical fashion and builds so directly on fundamental principles of physical inorganic chemistry that the book is actually applicable to a much broader audience.  It provides a very welcome presentation of frontier orbital theory as a guide to predicting and explaining much inorganic chemical reactivity.  There are numerous very  helpful charts and tables and diagrams.  I found myself using the book for a table of effective nuclear charges when I was teaching general chemistry last semester.  The examples are much more interesting that the typical textbook examples and would be easy to embellish and structure a course around.  There is also a helpful companion website that provides powerpoint slides, student exercises and answers.  The book covers some topics not typically seen in inorganic textbooks like the acidity of solids but the presentation of this information makes sense in light of the coherent framework of the text.  We so often tell our students "structure dictates function".  This text really make good on that promise.  My only complaint is that I wish the title were something more generic so that I could use it for a second semester of introductory-esque material that we teach after students have taken a single semester of intro chem and two semesters of organic chemistry.  So much of what is covered in this textbook is precisely what a second semester sophomore chemistry major should know before proceeding on in the major.  But the title makes the book hard to sell to chemistry majors and that is regrettable. 

Prerequisites: 
Course Level: 
29 Dec 2016

The Monsanto acetic acid process

Submitted by Chip Nataro, Lafayette College
Evaluation Methods: 

This was developed after the semester in which I teach this material. I look forward to using it next fall and I hope to post some evaluation data at that point.

Description: 

This literature discussion is based on one of early papers detailing the mechanism for the Monsanto acetic acid process (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 846). In this communicaiton the identification of key intermediates in this process is carried out using infrared spectroscopy. While the paper is an easy read, there are lots of subtle points that can be brought out by asking the right questions which hopefully this LO does. Although we have plenty of excellent LOs asking students to identify the individual steps in the catalytic mechanism, this LO takes a slightly different approach and marches students through the mechanism.

Course Level: 
Prerequisites: 
Corequisites: 
Subdiscipline: 
Learning Goals: 

Upon completing this LO students should be able to

  1. Use the CBC method to count electrons in the rhodium compounds in this paper
  2. Describe the bonding interaction between a metal and a terminal carbonyl ligand
  3. Identify the various reactions taking place in the Monsanto acetic acid process
  4. Relate data from IR spectroscopy to the bonding interaction between a metal and a ligand and to the identification of intermediates in this process
Time Required: 
50 minutes or so
28 Dec 2016

Virtual Issue of Organometallics

Submitted by Chip Nataro, Lafayette College

You can find the virtual issue with our editorial and all of the papers here.

Subdiscipline: 
Prerequisites: 
Corequisites: 
Course Level: 
27 Jun 2016

Online Homework for a Foundations of Inorganic Chemistry Course

Submitted by Sabrina G. Sobel, Hofstra University
Evaluation Methods: 

Students are graded on a sliding scale based on the number of attempts on each question. An overall grade is assigned at the end of the semester, adjusted to the number of points allotted for the homework in the syllabus. 

Evaluation Results: 

Student performance on the overall homework assignments for the semester includes questions assigned on General Chemistry topics that are part of this class syllabus. 

 201420152016
Number404741
Average89%80%83%
S.D.15%19%23%

In addition to gethering data on overall  performance, I and my student assistants, Loren Wolfin and Marissa Strumolo, have completed a statistical study to assess performance on individual questions, and to identify problem questions that need to be edited. We identified two separate issues: incorrect/poorly worded questions, and assignment of level of difficulty. Five problematic questions were identified and edited. The level of difficulty was reassigned for eight questions rated as medium (level 2); six were reassigned as difficult (level 3), and two were reassigned as easy (level 1). I look forward to assessing student performance in Spring 2017 in light of these improvements. Please feel free to implement this Sapling homework in your class, and help in the improvement/evolution of this database.

Description: 

The Committee on Professional Training (CPT) has restructured accreditation of Chemistry-related degrees, removing the old model of one year each of General, Analytical, Organic, and Physical Chemistry plus other relevant advanced classes as designed by the individual department. The new model (2008) requires one semester each in the five Foundation areas: Analytical, Inorganic, Organic, Biochemistry and Physical Chemistry, leaving General Chemistry as an option, with the development of advanced classes up to the individual departments. This has caused an upheaval in the treatment of Inorganic Chemistry, elevating it to be on equal footing with the other, more ‘traditional’ subdisciplines which has meant the decoupling of General Chemistry from introduction to Inorganic Chemistry. No commercial online homework system includes sets for either Foundations or Advanced Inorganic Chemistry topics. Sapling online homework (www.saplinglearning.com) has been open to professor authors of homework problems; they have a limited database of advanced inorganic chemistry problems produced by a generous and industrious faculty person. I have developed a homework set for a semester­-long freshman/sophomore level Inorganic Chemistry course aligned to the textbook Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry by Rayner-Canham and Overton (ISBN 1-4641-2560-0, www.whfreeman.com/descriptive6e ), and have test run it three times. Question development, analysis of student performance and troubleshooting in addition to topic choices, are critical to this process, especially in light of new information about what topics are taught in such a course (Great Expectations: Using an Analysis of Current Practices To Propose a Framework for the Undergraduate Inorganic Curriculum: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01320 ).This is an ongoing process, and I am working to improve the database all the time.

Prerequisites: 
Corequisites: 
Course Level: 
Learning Goals: 

1.      Increase understanding in these topic areas:

a.      Acid-base chemistry and solvent systems

b.      Bonding models of inorganic molecules and complexes

c.      Bonding models in extended systems (solids)

d.      Descriptive chemistry and Periodic Trends

e.      Electronic structure of inorganic molecules, complexes and solids

f.       Extended structures: unit cells and other solid-state structural features

g.      Molecular structure and shape of inorganic molecules

h.      Inorganic Complexes nomenclature, bonding and shapes

i.       Redox chemistry and application to inorganic systems

j.       Thermodynamics as applied to inorganic solids and inorganic systems

2.      Practice using knowledge in these topic areas:

a.      Acid-base chemistry and solvent systems

b.      Bonding models of inorganic molecules and complexes

c.      Bonding models in extended systems (solids)

d.      Descriptive chemistry and Periodic Trends

e.      Electronic structure of inorganic molecules, complexes and solids

f.       Extended structures: unit cells and other solid-state structural features

g.      Molecular structure and shape of inorganic molecules

h.      Inorganic Complexes nomenclature, bonding and shapes

i.       Redox chemistry and application to inorganic systems

j.       Thermodynamics as applied to inorganic solids and inorganic systems

Implementation Notes: 

The database of homework questions is available through Sapling Learning. They can be implemented as an online homework set for a class. Students need to buy access to the Sapling online homework for the duration of the class, typically $45.

Time Required: 
variable
23 May 2016

Ligand effects in titration calorimetry from the Angelici lab

Submitted by Chip Nataro, Lafayette College
Evaluation Methods: 

This LO was first presented during the 2016 Workshop at the University of Michigan. After working on the LO for a bit, the particpants were tasked with developing a rubric for this LO. This rubric has now been posted with the LO as a faculty only file. I thanks the participants for their contribution to this LO and their suggestions.

Description: 

This literature discussion focuses on a paper from the Angelici lab that examines the heat of protonation of [CpʹIr(PR3)(CO)] compounds. The compounds presented in the paper provide good introductory examples for electron counting in organometallic compounds. The single carbonyl ligand in these compounds provide an excellent probe to monitor the electron richness at the metal center which is impacted by the electron donor ability of the ligands. The technique of titration calorimetry presented in this paper is likely new to the students, but it is just a combination of two techniques they likely learned about in general chemistry. This LO was developed as part of the 2016 workshop on Organometallic Chemistry. 

Corequisites: 
Course Level: 
Learning Goals: 

A student should be able to

  1. apply the CBC method for electron counting to the Ir complexes in this paper
  2. explain the titration calorimetry experiment and describe what it measures
  3. describe the bonding in metal carbonyl compounds and explain how the electron richness at the metal center impacts the bonding in these compounds
  4. describe the electron donor ability difference of Cp* as compared to Cp
  5. explain the differences in electron donor ability of phosphine ligands
  6. relate the basicity of the metal complex to the electron donor ability of the ligands

A more advanced student may

  1. question the chemical shift of a M-H in the 1H NMR spectrum
  2. question the chemical shifts in the 31P NMR spectrum if they only have experience with 1H NMR
  3. connect the reactions performed in this paper to oxidative addition, in particular if they note the change in the valence of the Ir
  4. read the nucleophilicity studies in more detail
Implementation Notes: 

I use the CBC method of electron counting, so that is how the electron counting is presented. Certainly you can modify this to meet your electron counting needs.

The paper presents both the heat of protonation study and the reaction of the Ir compounds with MeI (referred to as nucleophilicity). The general trends in both studies are the same, but the nucleophilicity studies are a bit more complex to read. There is plenty to learn from this paper without worrying about the nucleophilicity studies, so the focus of the LO is on the heat of protonation studies. Additional questions could certainly be developed to include the nucleophilicity studies.

In order to guide the students, I would provide them with a pdf version of the paper with the following comments.

Page 1322 Experimental Section highlighted in yellow - There are lots of great details in the Experimental Section but most of them would only be useful if you are actually repeating this work. For our purposes you can skip most of these fine details.

The sub-sections highlighted in green provide general details about the experiments that were performed and should be read.

Numbers highlighted in blue may prove useful during our discussion of this paper.

Page 1322 Synthesis of CpIr(CO)(PR3) Complexes highlighted in green.

Beginning on page 1322 and ending on page 1324 all of the nCO values are highlighted in blue.

Page 1325 section Calorimetric Studies of Reaction 1 is highlighted in green.

Page 1326 Results is highlighted in yellow - While all of the results section contains interesting details, the sections highlighted in green will be most useful for our discussion.

Page 1327 Characterization of Products in Reactions 1 and 2 the first paragraph is highlighted in green.

Page 1327 Calorimetric Studies section is highlighted in green.

Page 1328 Discussion is highlighted in yellow - While all of this section is an interesting read, the subsection headings highlighted in green will be of the most use for our discussion.

Page 1328 Basicities of CpIr(CO)(PR3) Complexes 1-11 subsection is highlighted in green.

Page 1328 Basicities of Cp*Ir(CO)(PR3) Complexes 12-16 subsection is highlighted in green.

Page 1329 Effects of Cp* and Cp on Metal Basicity (DHHM) in CpʹIr(CO)(PR3) subsection is highlighted in green.

Time Required: 
~50 minutes

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Acid-base chemistry