Submitted by Darren Achey / Kutztown University on Thu, 07/02/2015 - 15:03
My Notes
Description

This literature discussion is meant to give students an understanding of both the key concept-driven and more “meta” information of a literature paper.  Students will use Jillian Dempsey’s paper, “Electrochemical hydrogenation of a homogeneous nickel complex to form a surface-adsorbed hydrogen-evolving species,” to investigate paper authorship, how the scientific method is used in research, and how to understand the important findings of a research article.

 

Reference: Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 5290-5293

DOI:10.1039/C4CC08662G

 

For a general chemistry course, questions 1-4, 7, and 10 could be utilized to expose students to the format of literature articles without diving too deeply into content.

 

For an advanced inorganic course, all questions could be used to include some introductory content to the discussion.

 

This learning object was developed at the 2015 NSF sponsored cCWCS VIPEr workshop at University of Washington where we were fortunate to hear Prof. Jillian Dempsey present this research. It is worth mentioning that the first author of this paper was an undergraduate student at UNC-CH. The Dempsey’s research lab focuses on developing new technology to support a solar energy economy through catalysis.

Attachment Size
Student Handout 25.77 KB
Student Handout - Revised Spring 2016 27.58 KB
Learning Goals

After completing this activity, the student will be able to:

  • access different parts of a paper and its supplementary information for different levels of understanding.
  • use information in a paper to determine the intent behind published research and how it fits into a larger purpose.
  • see that chemical research builds on earlier work and is an iterative process in which direction can change based on new information.
  • understand the difference between homogenous and heterogeneous catalysis
  • identify and define inorganic chemistry related terms
Implementation Notes

The first author of this publication, Daniel J. Martin is an undergraduate student!  It may be worth mentioning this fact to the students and to help them understand that in the academic world publications are the “currency” needed for career advancement.  We envision that the students will receive a copy of the article as well as the student handout containing the discussion questions several days prior to the discussion.  The faculty member may also choose to omit one or more questions from the student handout and only ask them during the discussion period.

Time Required
0.5-1.5 hours
Evaluation
Evaluation Methods

Options for assessment include:

  • Students can complete the questions and submit their responses which are then evaluated for clear understanding of the concepts (For example: Is the student able to describe clearly the purpose behind the paper?)
  • Students can be evaluated for the quality of their contributions to in-class discussion (Is it evident that the student read the paper?)
  • Students can be asked follow up questions on a later exam (Can the student recall the basic principles discussed in the activity?)
Evaluation Results

We have no results at this time for this newly created activity.  If you use this object in Fall 2015, please post comments to this LO so we can include yours results!

Creative Commons License
Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA